> -----Original Message-----
> From: Usyskin, Alexander
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 11:29 AM
> To: C, Ramalingam <ramalinga...@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
> <uma.shan...@intel.com>; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; seanp...@chromium.org; dan...@ffwll.ch;
> ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; Winkler, Tomas
> <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/40] misc/mei/hdcp: Store the HDCP
> Pairing
> info
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: C, Ramalingam
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 18:53
> > To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shan...@intel.com>; intel-
> > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > seanp...@chromium.org; dan...@ffwll.ch; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk;
> > jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; Winkler, Tomas <tomas.wink...@intel.com>;
> > Usyskin, Alexander <alexander.usys...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/40] misc/mei/hdcp: Store the
> > HDCP Pairing info
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday 09 May 2018 03:58 PM, Shankar, Uma wrote:
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
> > >> Behalf Of Ramalingam C
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7:27 PM
> > >> To: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > >> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; seanp...@chromium.org;
> > >> dan...@ffwll.ch; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk;
> > >> jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; Winkler, Tomas
> > >> <tomas.wink...@intel.com>; Usyskin, Alexander
> > >> <alexander.usys...@intel.com>
> > >> Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > >> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/40] misc/mei/hdcp: Store the HDCP
> > >> Pairing info
> > >>
> > >> Provides Pairing info to ME to store.
> > >>
> > >> Pairing is a process to fast track the subsequent authentication
> > >> with the same HDCP sink.
> > >>
> > >> On Success, received HDCP pairing info is stored in non-volatile
> > >> memory
> > of ME.
> > >>
> > >> v2:
> > >> Rebased.
> > >> v3:
> > >> cldev is passed as first parameter [Tomas]
> > >> Redundant comments and cast are removed [Tomas]
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c | 61
> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> include/linux/mei_hdcp.h | 10 +++++++
> > >> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
> > >> b/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
> > >> index fa548310de7a..60afdd0cee79 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
> > >> @@ -244,6 +244,67 @@ int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device
> > >> *cldev, struct mei_hdcp_data *data, }
> > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mei_verify_hprime);
> > >>
> > >> +/**
> > > Drop the extra *, unless you really love it :)
> > ha ha. Actually I have added intentionally. But removing them across
> > all patches as per your suggestions. :)
>
> /** is a syntax for KDoc, so if you want to receive automatic code
> documentation you should use it and adhere to KDoc syntax
Thanks Alexander for the information. At present I am not adding the KDoc
support, if it is not compulsory.
So I will remove the /**.
--Ram
> > >
> > >> + * mei_store_pairing_info:
> > >> + * Function to store pairing info received from panel
> > >> + *
> > >> + * @cldev : Pointer for mei client device
> > >> + * @data : Intel HW specific Data
> > >> + * @pairing_info : Pointer for AKE_Send_Pairing_Info
> > >> + *
> > >> + * Returns 0 on Success, <0 on Failure */
> > >> +
> > >> +int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> + struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
> > >> + struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info
> > >> *pairing_info)
> > {
> > >> + struct wired_cmd_ake_send_pairing_info_in pairing_info_in = { { > > >> 0
> > >> +}
> > };
> > >> + struct wired_cmd_ake_send_pairing_info_out pairing_info_out = {
> > >> {
> > 0 } };
> > >> + struct device *dev;
> > >> + ssize_t byte;
> > >> +
> > >> + if (!data || !pairing_info)
> > >> + return -EINVAL;
> > >> +
> > >> + dev = &cldev->dev;
> > >> +
> > >> + pairing_info_in.header.api_version = HDCP_API_VERSION;
> > >> + pairing_info_in.header.command_id =
> > >> WIRED_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO;
> > >> + pairing_info_in.header.status = ME_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> > >> + pairing_info_in.header.buffer_len =
> > >> +
> > >> WIRED_CMD_BUF_LEN_SEND_PAIRING_INFO_IN;
> > >> +
> > >> + pairing_info_in.port.integrated_port_type = data->port_type;
> > >> + pairing_info_in.port.physical_port = data->port;
> > >> +
> > >> + memcpy(pairing_info_in.e_kh_km, pairing_info->e_kh_km,
> > > Validate pairing_info->e_kh_km for NULL.
> > As we discussed we need not check for null here.
> > >
> > >> + sizeof(pairing_info_in.e_kh_km));
> > >> +
> > >> + byte = mei_cldev_send(cldev, (u8 *)&pairing_info_in,
> > >> + sizeof(pairing_info_in));
> > >> + if (byte < 0) {
> > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "mei_cldev_send failed. %d\n", (int)byte);
> > >> + return byte;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + byte = mei_cldev_recv(cldev, (u8 *)&pairing_info_out,
> > >> + sizeof(pairing_info_out));
> > >> + if (byte < 0) {
> > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "mei_cldev_recv failed. %d\n", (int)byte);
> > >> + return byte;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + if (pairing_info_out.header.status != ME_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "ME cmd 0x%08X failed. Status: 0x%X\n",
> > >> + WIRED_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO,
> > >> + pairing_info_out.header.status);
> > >> + return -1;
> > >> + }
> > > Leave a blank line here.
> > sure. I will do it in all patches. Thanks.
> >
> > --Ram
> > >
> > >> + return 0;
> > >> +}
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mei_store_pairing_info);
> > >> +
> > >> void mei_cldev_state_notify_clients(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> bool
> > enabled) {
> > >> if (enabled)
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h b/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h
> > >> index
> > >> 00bfde251ba4..be16e49d8018 100644
> > >> --- a/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h
> > >> @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ mei_verify_receiver_cert_prepare_km(struct
> > >> mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> size_t *msg_sz);
> > >> int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device *cldev, struct
> > >> mei_hdcp_data
> > *data,
> > >> struct hdcp2_ake_send_hprime *rx_hprime);
> > >> +int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> + struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
> > >> + struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info
> > >> *pairing_info);
> > >> #else
> > >> static int mei_cldev_register_notify(struct notifier_block *nb) {
> > >> @@
> > >> -150,5
> > >> +153,12 @@ int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> +struct
> > >> mei_hdcp_data *data, {
> > >> return -ENODEV;
> > >> }
> > >> +static inline
> > >> +int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> > >> + struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
> > >> + struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info
> > >> *pairing_info)
> > {
> > >> + return -ENODEV;
> > >> +}
> > >> #endif /* defined (CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP) */ #endif /* defined
> > >> (_LINUX_MEI_HDCP_H) */
> > >> --
> > >> 2.7.4
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> > >> intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
