On Friday 18 May 2018 06:19 PM, Shankar, Uma wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Ramalingam C
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7:28 PM
To: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
seanp...@chromium.org; dan...@ffwll.ch; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk;
jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; Winkler, Tomas <tomas.wink...@intel.com>;
Usyskin, Alexander <alexander.usys...@intel.com>
Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 32/40] drm/i915: Enable superior HDCP ver that is
capable
Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, When a setup supports
HDCP2.2 and HDCP1.4, HDCP2.2 will be enabled.
v2:
Included few optimization suggestions [Chris Wilson]
Commit message is updated as per the rebased version.
v3:
No changes.
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c | 76
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
index 383e35689fbd..01701d7b7b07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
@@ -27,6 +27,57 @@ static int _intel_hdcp2_disable(struct intel_connector
*connector); static void intel_hdcp2_check_work(struct work_struct *work);
static int intel_hdcp2_check_link(struct intel_connector *connector); static
int
intel_hdcp2_init(struct intel_connector *connector);
+static inline
+int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
+ const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim, u8 *bksv);
static
struct
+intel_digital_port *conn_to_dig_port(struct intel_connector
+*connector);
+
+static inline
Don’t have it as inline.
+bool panel_supports_hdcp(struct intel_connector *connector) {
+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = conn_to_dig_port(connector);
+ struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
+ bool capable = false;
+ u8 bksv[5];
+
+ if (hdcp->hdcp_shim) {
+ if (hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_capable) {
+ hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_capable(intel_dig_port,
&capable);
+ } else {
+ if (!intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(intel_dig_port,
+ hdcp->hdcp_shim,
bksv))
+ capable = true;
+ }
+ }
Leave a blank line.
+ return capable;
+}
+
+static inline
+bool panel_supports_hdcp2(struct intel_connector *connector) {
+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = conn_to_dig_port(connector);
+ struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
+ bool capable = false;
+
+ if (hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
+ hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_2_2_capable(intel_dig_port, &capable);
This looks a bit odd. We are going inside if hdcp2.2 is supported and checking
for capable.
I guess it needs a bit of renaming to make them implicit(Supported and capable
sounds
confusing). I believe supported is for platform and capable is for panel ?
As function name says, here we are checking the panel's hdcp2.2
compliance if the platform supports it.
I will add Explicit comment here.
Ram
+
+ return capable;
+}
+
+/* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Panel */ static inline bool
+intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
+ return (connector->hdcp.hdcp_shim &&
panel_supports_hdcp(connector));
+}
+
+/* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Panel */ static inline bool
+intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
+ return (connector->hdcp.hdcp2_supported &&
+ panel_supports_hdcp2(connector));
+}
static int intel_hdcp_poll_ksv_fifo(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim) @@ -
722,20 +773,27 @@ int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector, int
intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
if (!hdcp->hdcp_shim)
return -ENOENT;
mutex_lock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
- ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
+ /*
+ * Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, If the setup
+ * is capable of HDCP2.2, it is preferred to use HDCP2.2.
+ */
+ if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector))
+ ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
+ else if (intel_hdcp_capable(connector))
+ ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
+
+ if (!ret) {
+ hdcp->hdcp_value =
DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
+ schedule_work(&hdcp->hdcp_prop_work);
+ }
- hdcp->hdcp_value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
- schedule_work(&hdcp->hdcp_prop_work);
-out:
mutex_unlock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -752,10 +810,14 @@ int intel_hdcp_disable(struct intel_connector
*connector)
if (hdcp->hdcp_value !=
DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED) {
hdcp->hdcp_value =
DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED;
+ if (hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
+ _intel_hdcp2_disable(connector);
+
ret = _intel_hdcp_disable(connector);
}
mutex_unlock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hdcp->hdcp2_check_work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hdcp->hdcp_check_work);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
