On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:10:00PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, When a setup
> supports HDCP2.2 and HDCP1.4, HDCP2.2 will be enabled.
>
> v2:
> Included few optimization suggestions [Chris Wilson]
> Commit message is updated as per the rebased version.
> v3:
> No changes.
> v4:
> Extra comment added and Style issue fixed [Uma]
> v5:
> Rebased as part of patch reordering.
> Flag is added for tracking hdcp2.2 encryption status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c | 90
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 2eeb82b04953..7624388eecd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ struct intel_hdcp {
>
> /* HDCP2.2 related definitions */
> bool hdcp2_supported;
> + bool hdcp2_in_use;
>
> /*
> * Content Stream Type defined by content owner. TYPE0(0x0) content can
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> index 32a1a3f39b65..b34e3b1587d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,60 @@
> (enum hdcp_physical_port)(port))
>
> static int intel_hdcp2_init(struct intel_connector *connector);
> +static int _intel_hdcp2_enable(struct intel_connector *connector);
> +static int _intel_hdcp2_disable(struct intel_connector *connector);
> +static
> +int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> + const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim, u8 *bksv);
> +static
> +struct intel_digital_port *conn_to_dig_port(struct intel_connector
> *connector);
Please avoid forward declarations of static functions. Just place things
appropriately in the file.
> +
> +static bool panel_supports_hdcp(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = conn_to_dig_port(connector);
> + struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> + bool capable = false;
> + u8 bksv[5];
> +
> + if (hdcp->hdcp_shim) {
This function can only be called from
intel_hdcp_enable() -> intel_hdcp_capable() -> panel_supports_hdcp()
Both of those preceding functions check if hdcp_shim is NULL.
> + if (hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_capable) {
> + hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_capable(intel_dig_port, &capable);
> + } else {
> + if (!intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(intel_dig_port,
> + hdcp->hdcp_shim, bksv))
> + capable = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return capable;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +bool panel_supports_hdcp2(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = conn_to_dig_port(connector);
> + struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> + bool capable = false;
> +
> + /* Check the panel's hdcp2.2 compliance if platform supports it. */
> + if (hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
> + hdcp->hdcp_shim->hdcp_2_2_capable(intel_dig_port, &capable);
> +
> + return capable;
> +}
> +
> +/* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Panel */
> +static inline bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + return (connector->hdcp.hdcp_shim && panel_supports_hdcp(connector));
As mentioned, the hdcp_shim check is already covered by the caller. The way
things are setup, the shim checks only need to exist at the entry points
(enable/disable/check_link).
> +}
> +
> +/* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Panel */
> +static inline bool intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + return (connector->hdcp.hdcp2_supported &&
> + panel_supports_hdcp2(connector));
> +}
The panel_supports_* functions don't seem necessary, just do the work in the
intel_hdcp*_capable functions.
>
> static int intel_hdcp_poll_ksv_fifo(struct intel_digital_port
> *intel_dig_port,
> const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim)
> @@ -796,20 +850,27 @@ int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector,
> int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> if (!hdcp->hdcp_shim)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> mutex_lock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
>
> - ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + /*
> + * Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, If the setup
> + * is capable of HDCP2.2, it is preferred to use HDCP2.2.
> + */
> + if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector))
> + ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
> + else if (intel_hdcp_capable(connector))
> + ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + hdcp->hdcp_value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
> + schedule_work(&hdcp->hdcp_prop_work);
> + }
>
> - hdcp->hdcp_value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
> - schedule_work(&hdcp->hdcp_prop_work);
> -out:
> mutex_unlock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -826,7 +887,10 @@ int intel_hdcp_disable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>
> if (hdcp->hdcp_value != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED) {
> hdcp->hdcp_value = DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED;
> - ret = _intel_hdcp_disable(connector);
> + if (hdcp->hdcp2_in_use)
> + ret = _intel_hdcp2_disable(connector);
> + else
> + ret = _intel_hdcp_disable(connector);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&hdcp->hdcp_mutex);
> @@ -928,6 +992,16 @@ int intel_hdcp_check_link(struct intel_connector
> *connector)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int _intel_hdcp2_enable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int _intel_hdcp2_disable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
nit: It'd probably be better to introduce the stubs with an error message, since
as you have it, you'll be able to "enable" HDCP2 without doing anything.
Sean
> +
> static int i915_hdcp_component_master_bind(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_to_i915(dev);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
