https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108891
--- Comment #5 from Casey Bowman <casey.g.bow...@intel.com> ---
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #4)
> Just a very misleading bisect.
Agreed, the commit found would probably just cause the gem -hang tests to fail
in the kernel we're using as you mentioned earlier.
However, for the cases in which a basic subtest is run (for example,
igt@gem_busy@basic-busy-default or igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu) there
shouldn't be any hang checks (igt_allow_hang) for the requirements of those
subtests, right?
If so, should we change the bug title to reflect that some requirement checks
are being run on subtests that don't reflect the subtest names, like how
igt@gem_busy@basic-busy-default doesn't have 'hang' in it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
