On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:24:09AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-01-29 10:47 a.m., jgli...@redhat.com wrote:
> > +bool pci_test_p2p(struct device *devA, struct device *devB)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pciA, *pciB;
> > + bool ret;
> > + int tmp;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For now we only support PCIE peer to peer but other inter-connect
> > + * can be added.
> > + */
> > + pciA = find_parent_pci_dev(devA);
> > + pciB = find_parent_pci_dev(devB);
> > + if (pciA == NULL || pciB == NULL) {
> > + ret = false;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tmp = upstream_bridge_distance(pciA, pciB, NULL);
> > + ret = tmp < 0 ? false : true;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + pci_dev_put(pciB);
> > + pci_dev_put(pciA);
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_test_p2p);
>
> This function only ever returns false....
I guess it was nevr actually tested :(
I feel really worried about passing random 'struct device' pointers into
the PCI layer. Are we _sure_ it can handle this properly?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
