No, first of all I'm really busy with those TTM problems. And second I'm actually not very familiar with this either.
Please just split the patch up into two, one updating the headers and one fixing the test case. Maybe that's enough for Michel, Christian. Am 17.05.19 um 14:28 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing): Can you guy do that? Otherwise if kernel driver doesn't set that cap, test could fail. Thanks, -David -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm] enable syncobj test depending on capability From: "Koenig, Christian" To: Michel Dänzer ,"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Am 17.05.19 um 11:55 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > [CAUTION: External Email] > > On 2019-05-17 11:47 a.m., zhoucm1 wrote: >> ping, Could you help check in patch to gitlab? My connection to gitlab >> still has problem. > Please follow the process documented in include/drm/README for > include/drm/drm.h . Yeah, the header should be updated separately to what is currently in drm-next (or drm-misc-next). And then we can update the fix on top of that, Christian. > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
