Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:22:03PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Update the 'vsps' property structure in the documentation example to
> reflect what's actually implemented in the device tree sources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> index 100114ef11d5..262047053d31 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
> <&cpg CPG_MOD 722>,
> <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
> - vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> + vsps = <&vspd0 0 &vspd1 0 &vspd2 &vspd0 1>;
The former is simpler to read than the latter in my opinion. Shouldn't
we update the .dtsi files instead ?
> cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;
>
> ports {
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
