On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 18:28 +0000, Li, Sun peng (Leo) wrote: > > > On 2019-07-10 6:50 p.m., Lyude Paul wrote: > > gah. So, I was originally going to ask "why didn't we add the connector > > name > > into this?", but then I realized we're doing the right thing already and > > just > > doing card%d-%s % (card_number, path_prop). Which means we probably really > > don't > > want to add a property called mstpath, since it's hardly different from > > path > > (whoops!). > > > > Additionally, after some thinking I realized I may have made a mistake as > > I'm > > not entirely sure if we would need to specify the DRM card in the path > > prop for > > udev, considering that's specified in the sysfs path all ready. Even if > > I'm > > wrong on that though, I think it might be better not to add an mstpath > > property > > and just go the route of just adding a new path_v2 property that we could > > use > > for both MST and non-MST connector paths. (I cc'd you on the email thread > > about > > this, so you can read more about this there. > > Funny enough, I was originally trying to make this work for SST devices. > It didn't make sense to have by-name and by-path, but only have SST > exist in the by-name symlinks. The question there was "what to use for > sst paths?" Eventually I settled with keeping this purely for user > friendliness. But since discussion is already underway for a better > 'path', it makes sense to delay this.
Yeah-I think Ville's suggestion of making object IDs global instead of per- device might be what we want to go with, but getting the aux dev stuff in the kernel first is priority imo > > > So, I would actually suggest we just drop this patch entirely for now. We > > should > > be fine without it, even though the dp_aux_dev paths will be kind of ugly > > for a > > little while. I'd rather the rest of this series get upstream first, and > > try to > > do the path prop stuff separately.> > > Sounds fair, going to spin up v3. > > Thanks! > Leo > > > On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 10:32 -0400, sunpeng...@amd.com wrote: > > > From: Leo Li <sunpeng...@amd.com> > > > > > > This can be used to create more descriptive symlinks for MST aux > > > devices. Consider the following udev rule: > > > > > > SUBSYSTEM=="drm_dp_aux_dev", SUBSYSTEMS=="drm", ATTRS{mstpath}=="?*", > > > SYMLINK+="drm_dp_aux/by-path/$attr{mstpath}" > > > > > > The following symlinks will be created (depending on your MST topology): > > > > > > $ ls /dev/drm_dp_aux/by-path/ > > > card0-mst:0-1 card0-mst:0-1-1 card0-mst:0-1-8 card0-mst:0-8 > > > > > > v2: remove unnecessary locking of mode_config.mutex > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng...@amd.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c > > > index ad10810bc972..7d483ab684a0 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c > > > @@ -236,16 +236,36 @@ static ssize_t modes_show(struct device *device, > > > return written; > > > } > > > > > > +static ssize_t mstpath_show(struct device *device, > > > + struct device_attribute *attr, > > > + char *buf) > > > +{ > > > + struct drm_connector *connector = to_drm_connector(device); > > > + ssize_t ret = 0; > > > + char *path; > > > + > > > + if (!connector->path_blob_ptr) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + path = connector->path_blob_ptr->data; > > > + ret = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "card%d-%s\n", > > > + connector->dev->primary->index, path); > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > +} > > > + > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(status); > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(enabled); > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dpms); > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modes); > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mstpath); > > > > > > static struct attribute *connector_dev_attrs[] = { > > > &dev_attr_status.attr, > > > &dev_attr_enabled.attr, > > > &dev_attr_dpms.attr, > > > &dev_attr_modes.attr, > > > + &dev_attr_mstpath.attr, > > > NULL > > > }; > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel