Hi Guido.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> This makes it symmetric with the panel init happening in enable().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <a...@sigxcpu.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.c
> index c6b4bfd79fde..cc89831e30a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-rocktech-jh057n00900.c
> @@ -158,19 +158,23 @@ static int jh057n_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  static int jh057n_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  {
>       struct jh057n *ctx = panel_to_jh057n(panel);
> +     struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = backlight_disable(ctx->backlight);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
We most likely do not want to skip mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off()
just because we fail to disable backlight.
Most other panels disable backlight without a check for the return
value.

        Sam
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to