On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <syrj...@sci.fi> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:12:35PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Rob Clark <rob.cl...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > note that the test phase doesn't need vblank events, and also >> > shouldn't -EBUSY if there is still a pending flip[*], so I'd propose >> > that however we go about pageflip (one super-ioctl, or one per crtc), >> > we could use the atomic-modeset ioctl for the test step >> >> actually, I think I take this back.. one thing that was discussed on >> IRC, but didn't make it to this email thread is the behavior of >> non-specified properties. What I am thinking: >> >> modeset: unspecified properties revert to default >> pageflip: unspecified properties preserve current value > > Why on earth would you want to revert stuff to default? That's only > going to make the code more complex.
well, you need to do it *somewhere*.. possibly it can be on drm file close or dropmaster. But modeset seems like a sensible place. I really hate the v4l2 approach of preserving settings for the next process that opens the device. BR, -R > -- > Ville Syrjälä > syrj...@sci.fi > http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
