Hello, On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:23:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:48 AM Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodconfig) produced this warning: > > > > > > warning: same module names found: > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.ko > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.ko > > > warning: same module names found: > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.ko > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.ko > > > warning: same module names found: > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.ko > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-acx565akm.ko > > > warning: same module names found: > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.ko > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.ko > > > warning: same module names found: > > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.ko > > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.ko > > > > > > Introduced by commits > > > > > > df439abe6501 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the NEC NL8048HL11 panel") > > > c9cf4c2a3bd3 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Sharp LS037V7DW01 panel") > > > 1c8fc3f0c5d2 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Sony ACX565AKM panel") > > > 415b8dd08711 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Toppoly TD028TTEC1 panel") > > > dc2e1e5b2799 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Toppoly TD043MTEA1 panel") > > > > Ups, had not seen this one coming. > > We are in the process of removing the drivers in > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/ > > and decided to introduce the new drivers early to get them out of a > > longer patch series.
Oops :-( The new drivers were initially part of a patch series that removed the duplicated drivers. The new drivers then got fast-tracked, and I didn't notice this issue. > Should we have a config dependency to not allow the old fbdev omap > when the drm omap driver is enabled? I think that would take care of > all this. > > Or too annoying for development? > > Also note that fbdev is in drm-misc now, so we should be able to fix > this all without cross-tree conflicts. Note that drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/ will stay, it's drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/ that is being removed. FB_OMAP2 already depends on DRM_OMAP = n, I propose doing something similar at the level of the individual display drivers. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart