On 23/08/2019 03:12, Rob Herring wrote:
Doing a pm_runtime_put as soon as a job is submitted is wrong as it should
not happen until the job completes. It works because we are relying on the
autosuspend timeout to keep the h/w enabled.
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.pr...@arm.com>
Cc: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzw...@collabora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
Nice find, but I'm a bit worried about one thing.
---
v2: new patch
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
index 05c85f45a0de..80c9cab9a01b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct panfrost_job
*job, int js)
return;
if (WARN_ON(job_read(pfdev, JS_COMMAND_NEXT(js))))
- goto end;
+ return;
cfg = panfrost_mmu_as_get(pfdev, &job->file_priv->mmu);
@@ -187,10 +187,6 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct panfrost_job *job, int js)
job_write(pfdev, JS_COMMAND_NEXT(js), JS_COMMAND_START);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pfdev->hwaccess_lock, flags);
-
-end:
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pfdev->dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->dev);
}
static void panfrost_acquire_object_fences(struct drm_gem_object **bos,
@@ -388,9 +384,13 @@ static void panfrost_job_timedout(struct drm_sched_job
*sched_job)
mutex_lock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++) {
drm_sched_stop(&pfdev->js->queue[i].sched, sched_job);
-
+ if (pfdev->jobs[i]) {
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(pfdev->dev);
+ pfdev->jobs[i] = NULL;
I can't see what prevents this racing with panfrost_job_irq_handler() -
the job could be completing at the same time as we assign NULL. Then
panfrost_job_irq_handler() will happily dereference the NULL pointer...
Admittedly this patch is an improvement over the situation before :)
Steve
+ }
+ }
if (sched_job)
drm_sched_increase_karma(sched_job);
@@ -455,7 +455,9 @@ static irqreturn_t panfrost_job_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
pfdev->jobs[j] = NULL;
panfrost_mmu_as_put(pfdev, &job->file_priv->mmu);
panfrost_devfreq_record_transition(pfdev, j);
+
dma_fence_signal(job->done_fence);
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->dev);
}
status &= ~mask;
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
