Hi Fabrizio,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:38:33PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> The HiHope RZ/G2M is advertised as compatible with panel idk-1110wr
> from Advantech, however the panel isn't sold alongside the board.
> A new dts, adding everything that's required to get the panel to
> work the HiHope RZ/G2M, is the most convenient way to support the
> HiHope RZ/G2M when it's connected to the idk-1110wr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.cas...@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * added space between lvds-connector-en-gpio and curly brace
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile | 1 +
> .../r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dts | 86
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> index 42b74c2..5d94301 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774A1) += r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774A1) += r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774A1) += r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774C0) += r8a774c0-cat874.dtb r8a774c0-ek874.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7795) += r8a7795-salvator-x.dtb r8a7795-h3ulcb.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7795) += r8a7795-h3ulcb-kf.dtb
> diff --git
> a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..67fe04c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex-idk-1110wr.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for the HiHope RZ/G2M sub board connected to an
> + * Advantech IDK-1110WR 10.1" LVDS panel
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> + */
> +
> +#include "r8a774a1-hihope-rzg2m-ex.dts"
> +
> +/ {
> + backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm0 0 50000>;
> +
> + brightness-levels = <0 2 8 16 32 64 128 255>;
> + default-brightness-level = <6>;
> + };
> +
> + panel-lvds {
> + compatible = "advantech,idk-1110wr", "panel-lvds";
> +
> + width-mm = <223>;
> + height-mm = <125>;
> +
> + data-mapping = "jeida-24";
> +
> + panel-timing {
> + /* 1024x600 @60Hz */
> + clock-frequency = <51200000>;
> + hactive = <1024>;
> + vactive = <600>;
> + hsync-len = <240>;
> + hfront-porch = <40>;
> + hback-porch = <40>;
> + vfront-porch = <15>;
> + vback-porch = <10>;
> + vsync-len = <10>;
> + };
> +
> + port {
> + panel_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&gpio1 {
> + /*
> + * When GP1_20 is LOW LVDS0 is connected to the LVDS connector
> + * When GP1_20 is HIGH LVDS0 is connected to the LT8918L
> + */
I knew that runtime-configurable output routing would be needed one day.
While I'm not opposed to merging this patch as-is, it means that a board
shipping this DT will not support the DSI output. I suppose that's not a
problem as using DSI would require an external DSI panel, which would
require a different DT anyway. In the general case, however,
implementing support in the DU driver for output routing outside the SoC
will be interesting to say the least :-)
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> + lvds-connector-en-gpio {
> + gpio-hog;
> + gpios = <20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + output-low;
> + line-name = "lvds-connector-en-gpio";
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&lvds0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + port@1 {
> + lvds0_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pfc {
> + pwm0_pins: pwm0 {
> + groups = "pwm0";
> + function = "pwm0";
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pwm0 {
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pins>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + status = "okay";
> +};
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
