On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The scheduler uses a (currently private) fixed_power_int() in its load
> average computation for computing powers of numbers 0 < x < 1
> expressed as fixed-point numbers, which is also what we want here. But
> that requires the scale to be a power-of-2.
It feels like there is some rationale missing in the description here.
What is the benefit of replacing the explicit int_pow() with the
implicit multiplications?
Daniel.
>
> We could (and a following patch will) change to use a power-of-2 scale,
> but for a fixed small exponent of 3, there's no advantage in using
> repeated squaring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 9252d51f31b9..aee6839e024a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ static u64 cie1931(unsigned int lightness, unsigned int
> scale)
> if (lightness <= (8 * scale)) {
> retval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(lightness * 10, 9033);
> } else {
> - retval = int_pow((lightness + (16 * scale)) / 116, 3);
> + retval = (lightness + (16 * scale)) / 116;
> + retval *= retval * retval;
> retval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(retval, (scale * scale));
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
