On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:45:26AM -0500, mikita.lip...@amd.com wrote:
> From: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lip...@amd.com>
>
> We shouldn't compare int with unsigned long to find the max value
> and since we are not expecting negative value returned from
> compute_offset we should make this function return unsigned long
> so we can compare the values when computing rc parameters.
Why are there other unsigned longs in dsc parameter computation
in the first place?
>
> Cc: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cor...@amd.com>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentl...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lip...@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c
> index 74f3527f567d..ec40604ab6a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c
> @@ -245,11 +245,11 @@ void drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack(struct
> drm_dsc_picture_parameter_set *pps_payload,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack);
>
> -static int compute_offset(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg, int
> pixels_per_group,
> +static unsigned long compute_offset(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg, int
> pixels_per_group,
> int groups_per_line, int grpcnt)
> {
> - int offset = 0;
> - int grpcnt_id = DIV_ROUND_UP(vdsc_cfg->initial_xmit_delay,
> pixels_per_group);
> + unsigned long offset = 0;
> + unsigned long grpcnt_id = DIV_ROUND_UP(vdsc_cfg->initial_xmit_delay,
> pixels_per_group);
>
> if (grpcnt <= grpcnt_id)
> offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(grpcnt * pixels_per_group *
> vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel, 16);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
