Hi Chanwoo,

On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I need the time to dig the ICC framework
> to understand them detailed. After that, I'll review this.

Any updates on this topic?

Regardless of the purpose of this RFC, I think patches 01-04
are still beneficial to devfreq. I can rebase and post them
as a separate series if you wish.

> Basically, I agree this approach. But, I'm wondering
> the existing binding method between 'bus_leftbus' and 'bus_dmc'.
> From before, I thought that devfreq framework need to
> enhance the binding method between parent devfreq device
> and passive devfreq device instead of 'devfreq' property.
> 
> On this patch, use the same binding way between
> 'bus_leftbus' and 'bus_dmc' with 'parent' property
> as following:
> 
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
>  &bus_leftbus {
>       devfreq-events = <&ppmu_leftbus_3>, <&ppmu_rightbus_3>;
>       vdd-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
> +     parent = <&bus_dmc>;
>       status = "okay";
>  };
> 
> I'm not sure about continuing to use this method for new feature.
> If possible, hope to replace the existing binding style
> with new method like of_graph. Actually, I don't know the correct method.
> 
> 
> On 19. 9. 19. 오후 11:22, Artur Świgoń wrote:
> > From: Artur Świgoń <a.swi...@partner.samsung.com>
> > 
> > This patch adds interconnect functionality to the exynos-bus devfreq
> > driver.
> > 
> > The SoC topology is a graph (or, more specifically, a tree) and most of
> > its edges are taken from the devfreq parent-child hierarchy (cf.
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt). Due to
> > unspecified relative probing order, -EPROBE_DEFER may be propagated to
> > guarantee that a child is probed before its parent.
> > 
> > Each bus is now an interconnect provider and an interconnect node as well
> > (cf. Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst), i.e. every bus registers
> > itself as a node. Node IDs are not hardcoded but rather assigned at
> > runtime, in probing order (subject to the above-mentioned exception
> > regarding relative order). This approach allows for using this driver with
> > various Exynos SoCs.
> > 
> > Frequencies requested via the interconnect API for a given node are
> > propagated to devfreq using dev_pm_qos_update_request(). Please note that
> > it is not an error when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n', in which case all
> > interconnect API functions are no-op.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swi...@partner.samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 8d44810cac69..e0232202720d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -14,14 +14,19 @@
> >  #include <linux/devfreq-event.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/idr.h>
> > +#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  
> >  #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO   40
> >  
> > +#define icc_units_to_khz(x) ((x) / 8)
> > +
> >  struct exynos_bus {
> >     struct device *dev;
> >  
> > @@ -35,6 +40,12 @@ struct exynos_bus {
> >     struct opp_table *opp_table;
> >     struct clk *clk;
> >     unsigned int ratio;
> > +
> > +   /* One provider per bus, one node per provider */
> > +   struct icc_provider provider;
> > +   struct icc_node *node;
> > +
> > +   struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -59,6 +70,13 @@ exynos_bus_ops_edev(enable_edev);
> >  exynos_bus_ops_edev(disable_edev);
> >  exynos_bus_ops_edev(set_event);
> >  
> > +static int exynos_bus_next_id(void)
> > +{
> > +   static DEFINE_IDA(exynos_bus_icc_ida);
> > +
> > +   return ida_alloc(&exynos_bus_icc_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int exynos_bus_get_event(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >                             struct devfreq_event_data *edata)
> >  {
> > @@ -171,6 +189,38 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> >     clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> > +{
> > +   struct exynos_bus *src_bus = src->data, *dst_bus = dst->data;
> > +   s32 src_freq = icc_units_to_khz(src->avg_bw);
> > +   s32 dst_freq = icc_units_to_khz(dst->avg_bw);
> > +
> > +   dev_pm_qos_update_request(&src_bus->qos_req, src_freq);
> > +   dev_pm_qos_update_request(&dst_bus->qos_req, dst_freq);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 
> > avg_bw,
> > +                               u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak)
> > +{
> > +   *agg_avg += avg_bw;
> > +   *agg_peak = max(*agg_peak, peak_bw);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct icc_node *exynos_bus_icc_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
> > +                                        void *data)
> > +{
> > +   struct exynos_bus *bus = data;
> > +
> > +   if (spec->np != bus->dev->of_node)
> > +           return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > +   return bus->node;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> >                                     struct exynos_bus *bus)
> >  {
> > @@ -366,6 +416,101 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct 
> > exynos_bus *bus,
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_connect(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > +   struct device_node *np = bus->dev->of_node;
> > +   struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> > +   struct icc_node *parent_node = NULL;
> > +   struct of_phandle_args args;
> > +   int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +   parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(bus->dev, 0);
> > +   if (!IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
> > +           struct exynos_bus *parent_bus;
> > +
> > +           parent_bus = dev_get_drvdata(parent_devfreq->dev.parent);
> > +           parent_node = parent_bus->node;
> > +   } else {
> > +           /* Look for parent in DT */
> > +           int num = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > +                                                "#interconnect-cells");
> > +           if (num != 1)
> > +                   goto out; /* 'parent' is optional */
> > +
> > +           ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > +                                            "#interconnect-cells",
> > +                                            0, &args);
> > +           if (ret < 0)
> > +                   goto out;
> > +
> > +           of_node_put(args.np);
> > +
> > +           parent_node = of_icc_get_from_provider(&args);
> > +           if (IS_ERR(parent_node)) {
> > +                   /* May be -EPROBE_DEFER */
> > +                   ret = PTR_ERR(parent_node);
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> 
> 
> 
> > +
> > +   ret = icc_link_create(bus->node, parent_node->id);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_init(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > +   struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> > +   struct icc_provider *provider = &bus->provider;
> > +   struct icc_node *node;
> > +   int id, ret;
> > +
> > +   /* Initialize the interconnect provider */
> > +   provider->set = exynos_bus_icc_set;
> > +   provider->aggregate = exynos_bus_icc_aggregate;
> > +   provider->xlate = exynos_bus_icc_xlate;
> > +   provider->dev = dev;
> > +   provider->data = bus;
> > +
> > +   ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> > +   if (ret < 0)
> > +           goto out;
> > +
> > +   ret = id = exynos_bus_next_id();
> > +   if (ret < 0)
> > +           goto err_node;
> > +
> > +   node = icc_node_create(id);
> > +   if (IS_ERR(node)) {
> > +           ret = PTR_ERR(node);
> > +           goto err_node;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   bus->node = node;
> > +   node->name = dev->of_node->name;
> > +   node->data = bus;
> > +   icc_node_add(node, provider);
> > +
> > +   ret = exynos_bus_icc_connect(bus);
> > +   if (ret < 0)
> > +           goto err_connect;
> > +
> > +   ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(bus->devfreq->dev.parent, &bus->qos_req,
> > +                                DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +   return ret;
> > +
> > +err_connect:
> > +   icc_node_del(node);
> > +   icc_node_destroy(id);
> > +err_node:
> > +   icc_provider_del(provider);
> > +
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -415,6 +560,14 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >     if (ret < 0)
> >             goto err;
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * Initialize interconnect provider. A return value of -ENOTSUPP means
> > +    * that CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled.
> > +    */
> > +   ret = exynos_bus_icc_init(bus);
> > +   if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTSUPP)
> > +           goto err;
> > +
> >     max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
> >     min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
> >     max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
> > 
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Artur Świgoń
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to