On 12/4/19 10:35 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 19.11.19 um 14:47 schrieb Benjamin Gaignard:
>> When compiling with W=1 few warnings about unused variables show up.
>> This patch removes all the involved variables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaign...@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 22 +++-------------------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index 88232698d7a0..aca901aff042 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device 
>> *dev, int hdisplay,
>>              /* 3) Nominal HSync width (% of line period) - default 8 */
>>   #define CVT_HSYNC_PERCENTAGE       8
>>              unsigned int hblank_percentage;
>> -            int vsyncandback_porch, vback_porch, hblank;
>> +            int vsyncandback_porch, hblank;
>>   
>>              /* estimated the horizontal period */
>>              tmp1 = HV_FACTOR * 1000000  -
>> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device 
>> *dev, int hdisplay,
>>              else
>>                      vsyncandback_porch = tmp1;
>>              /* 10. Find number of lines in back porch */
>> -            vback_porch = vsyncandback_porch - vsync;
>>              drm_mode->vtotal = vdisplay_rnd + 2 * vmargin +
>>                              vsyncandback_porch + CVT_MIN_V_PORCH;
>>              /* 5) Definition of Horizontal blanking time limitation */
>> @@ -386,9 +385,8 @@ drm_gtf_mode_complex(struct drm_device *dev, int 
>> hdisplay, int vdisplay,
>>      int top_margin, bottom_margin;
>>      int interlace;
>>      unsigned int hfreq_est;
>> -    int vsync_plus_bp, vback_porch;
>> -    unsigned int vtotal_lines, vfieldrate_est, hperiod;
>> -    unsigned int vfield_rate, vframe_rate;
>> +    int vsync_plus_bp;
>> +    unsigned int vtotal_lines;
>>      int left_margin, right_margin;
>>      unsigned int total_active_pixels, ideal_duty_cycle;
>>      unsigned int hblank, total_pixels, pixel_freq;
>> @@ -451,23 +449,9 @@ drm_gtf_mode_complex(struct drm_device *dev, int 
>> hdisplay, int vdisplay,
>>      /* [V SYNC+BP] = RINT(([MIN VSYNC+BP] * hfreq_est / 1000000)) */
>>      vsync_plus_bp = MIN_VSYNC_PLUS_BP * hfreq_est / 1000;
>>      vsync_plus_bp = (vsync_plus_bp + 500) / 1000;
>> -    /*  9. Find the number of lines in V back porch alone: */
>> -    vback_porch = vsync_plus_bp - V_SYNC_RQD;
>>      /*  10. Find the total number of lines in Vertical field period: */
>>      vtotal_lines = vdisplay_rnd + top_margin + bottom_margin +
>>                      vsync_plus_bp + GTF_MIN_V_PORCH;
>> -    /*  11. Estimate the Vertical field frequency: */
>> -    vfieldrate_est = hfreq_est / vtotal_lines;
>> -    /*  12. Find the actual horizontal period: */
>> -    hperiod = 1000000 / (vfieldrate_rqd * vtotal_lines);
>> -
>> -    /*  13. Find the actual Vertical field frequency: */
>> -    vfield_rate = hfreq_est / vtotal_lines;
>> -    /*  14. Find the Vertical frame frequency: */
>> -    if (interlaced)
>> -            vframe_rate = vfield_rate / 2;
>> -    else
>> -            vframe_rate = vfield_rate;
> The amount of unused code is quite large, which makes me wonder if
> there's something missing below where these variables are supposed to be
> used.
>
> If these variables can be removed, comments should mention that steps 9
> and 11 to 14 are being left out. After all, the function is fairly
> explicit about implementing the GTF algorithm step by step.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas

If the goal is to keep all the steps then I could prefix all problematic 
variables with __maybe_unused macro.

Benjamin

>
>>      /*  15. Find number of pixels in left margin: */
>>      if (margins)
>>              left_margin = (hdisplay_rnd * GTF_MARGIN_PERCENTAGE + 500) /
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to