Hi Fabrizio,

Thank you for the patch.

On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:32:50PM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> For dual-LVDS configurations, it is now possible to mark the
> DT port nodes for the sink with boolean properties (like
> dual-lvds-even-pixels and dual-lvds-odd-pixels) to let drivers
> know the encoders need to be configured in dual-LVDS mode.
> 
> Rework the implementation of rcar_lvds_parse_dt_companion
> to make use of the DT markers while keeping backward
> compatibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.cas...@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> ---
> v3->v4:
> * New patch extracted from patch:
>   "drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add dual-LVDS panels support"
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c | 56 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> index 3cb0a83..6c1f171 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcar_lvds_dual_link);
>  static int rcar_lvds_parse_dt_companion(struct rcar_lvds *lvds)
>  {
>       const struct of_device_id *match;
> -     struct device_node *companion;
> +     struct device_node *companion, *p0, *p1;

Could you rename p0 and p1 to port0 and port1, and spit them to a
separate line of variable declaration ?

> +     struct rcar_lvds *companion_lvds;
>       struct device *dev = lvds->dev;
> +     int dual_link;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
>       /* Locate the companion LVDS encoder for dual-link operation, if any. */
> @@ -689,13 +691,55 @@ static int rcar_lvds_parse_dt_companion(struct 
> rcar_lvds *lvds)
>               goto done;
>       }
>  
> +     /*
> +      * We need to work out if the sink is expecting us to function in
> +      * dual-link mode. We do this by looking at the DT port nodes we are
> +      * connected to, if they are marked as expecting even pixels and
> +      * odd pixels than we need to enable vertical stripe output.
> +      */
> +     p0 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1);
> +     p1 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(companion, 1);
> +     dual_link = drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order(p0, p1);
> +     of_node_put(p0);
> +     of_node_put(p1);
> +     if (dual_link >= DRM_LVDS_DUAL_LINK_EVEN_ODD_PIXELS) {
> +             lvds->dual_link = true;
> +     } else if (lvds->next_bridge && lvds->next_bridge->timings) {
> +             /*
> +              * Early dual-link bridge specific implementations populate the
> +              * timings field of drm_bridge, read the dual_link flag off the
> +              * bridge directly for backward compatibility.
> +              */
> +             lvds->dual_link = lvds->next_bridge->timings->dual_link;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!lvds->dual_link) {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Single-link configuration detected\n");
> +             goto done;
> +     }
> +
>       lvds->companion = of_drm_find_bridge(companion);
>       if (!lvds->companion) {
>               ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>               goto done;
>       }
>  
> -     dev_dbg(dev, "Found companion encoder %pOF\n", companion);
> +     dev_dbg(dev,
> +             "Dual-link configuration detected (companion encoder %pOF)\n",
> +             companion);
> +
> +     companion_lvds = bridge_to_rcar_lvds(lvds->companion);

Could you move this line after the FIXME comment ?

With these small issues fixed,

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>

> +
> +     /*
> +      * FIXME: We should not be messing with the companion encoder private
> +      * data from the primary encoder, we should rather let the companion
> +      * encoder work things out on its own. However, the companion encoder
> +      * doesn't hold a reference to the primary encoder, and
> +      * drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order needs to be given references
> +      * to the output ports of both encoders, therefore leave it like this
> +      * for the time being.
> +      */
> +     companion_lvds->dual_link = true;
>  
>  done:
>       of_node_put(companion);
> @@ -739,13 +783,7 @@ static int rcar_lvds_parse_dt(struct rcar_lvds *lvds)
>       if (ret)
>               goto done;
>  
> -     if ((lvds->info->quirks & RCAR_LVDS_QUIRK_DUAL_LINK) &&
> -         lvds->next_bridge)
> -             lvds->dual_link = lvds->next_bridge->timings
> -                             ? lvds->next_bridge->timings->dual_link
> -                             : false;
> -
> -     if (lvds->dual_link)
> +     if (lvds->info->quirks & RCAR_LVDS_QUIRK_DUAL_LINK)
>               ret = rcar_lvds_parse_dt_companion(lvds);
>  
>  done:

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to