Hi Tomi, On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:11:23PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 11/12/2019 00:57, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Display connectors are modelled in DT as a device node, but have so far > > been handled manually in several bridge drivers. This resulted in > > duplicate code in several bridge drivers, with slightly different (and > > thus confusing) logics. > > > > In order to fix this, implement a bridge driver for display connectors. > > The driver centralises logic for the DVI, HDMI, VGAn composite and > > S-video connectors and exposes corresponding bridge operations. > > > > This driver in itself doesn't solve the issue completely, changes in > > bridge and display controller drivers are needed to make use of the new > > connector driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org> > > --- > > Changes since v2: > > > > - Fall back to polling if the GPIO IRQ chip doesn't support > > edge-triggered interrupts > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > - Use drm_get_connector_type_name() instead of open-coding > > display_connector_type_name() > > - Remove empty .hpd_enable() and .hpd_disable() operations > > - Set bridge.ddc > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 11 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 304 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c > > <snip> > > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, > > + "Found %s display connector '%s' %s DDC bus and %s HPD GPIO > > (ops 0x%x)\n", > > + drm_get_connector_type_name(conn->bridge.type), > > + conn->label ? conn->label : "<unlabelled>", > > + conn->bridge.ddc ? "with" : "without", > > + conn->hpd_gpio ? "with" : "without", > > + conn->bridge.ops); > > On AM5 EVM, we have HDMI output with DDC and HPD, but I get a kernel print: > > display-connector connector: Found HDMI-A display connector 'hdmi' without > DDC bus and without HPD > GPIO (ops 0x0) > > I think that print may be quite confusing for someone who doesn't know the > details of the drivers > involved.
I agree, but the information could be useful for developers. Do you think it should be dropped ? Or do you have an alternative wording to propose ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
