Hi Lucas
Am Mo., 6. Jan. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>:
>
> On Mo, 2020-01-06 at 11:57 +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> > Hi Lucas
> >
> > Am Mo., 6. Jan. 2020 um 11:03 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach
> > <l.st...@pengutronix.de>:
> > > On Do, 2020-01-02 at 11:02 +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> > > > They will be used for extended HWDB support. The eco id logic was taken
> > > > from galcore kernel driver sources.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmei...@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.h | 6 +++---
> > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > > index d47d1a8e0219..253301be9e95 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > > @@ -321,6 +321,18 @@ static void etnaviv_hw_specs(struct etnaviv_gpu
> > > > *gpu)
> > > > gpu->identity.varyings_count -= 1;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void etnaviv_hw_eco_id(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu)
> > > > +{
> > > > + const u32 chipDate = gpu_read(gpu, VIVS_HI_CHIP_DATE);
> > > > + gpu->identity.eco_id = gpu_read(gpu, VIVS_HI_CHIP_ECO_ID);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (etnaviv_is_model_rev(gpu, GC1000, 0x5037) && (chipDate ==
> > > > 0x20120617))
> > > > + gpu->identity.eco_id = 1;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (etnaviv_is_model_rev(gpu, GC320, 0x5303) && (chipDate ==
> > > > 0x20140511))
> > > > + gpu->identity.eco_id = 1;
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if those two checks warrant a separate function. Maybe
> > > just place them besides the other ID fixups?
> > >
> >
> > This is almost a 1:1 copy of _GetEcoID(..) but will try to move the fixups.
> >
> >
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void etnaviv_hw_identify(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu)
> > > > {
> > > > u32 chipIdentity;
> > > > @@ -362,6 +374,8 @@ static void etnaviv_hw_identify(struct etnaviv_gpu
> > > > *gpu)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + gpu->identity.product_id = gpu_read(gpu,
> > > > VIVS_HI_CHIP_PRODUCT_ID);
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * NXP likes to call the GPU on the i.MX6QP GC2000+, but
> > > > in
> > > > * reality it's just a re-branded GC3000. We can identify
> > > > this
> > > > @@ -375,6 +389,9 @@ static void etnaviv_hw_identify(struct etnaviv_gpu
> > > > *gpu)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + etnaviv_hw_eco_id(gpu);
> > > > + gpu->identity.customer_id = gpu_read(gpu,
> > > > VIVS_HI_CHIP_CUSTOMER_ID);
> > >
> > > I don't like this scattering of identity register reads. Please move
> > > all of those reads to the else clause where we currently read
> > > model/rev. I doubt that the customer ID register is available on the
> > > really early cores, that only have the VIVS_HI_CHIP_IDENTITY register.
> > >
> >
> > There is feature bit for it: chipMinorFeatures5_HAS_PRODUCTID
> > Will change the code to make use of it. Shall I still put it in the
> > else clause then?
>
> If there's a feature bit we need to move the read toward the end of the
> function, as we currently read the features as the last step in the
> hw_identify.
>
> But then I'm not sure if the HAS_PRODUCTID feature bit is correct. At
> least wumpus' gpus_comparison says that none of the known <= GC3000
> cores has it set, which seems... suspicious.
>
Hmm... what if I just mimic what is done here?
https://github.com/etnaviv/vivante_kernel_drivers/blob/master/imx8_v6.2.3.129602/hal/kernel/arch/gc_hal_kernel_hardware.c#L220
Unconditionally read the product id at the end of the else clause. The
same is done in the stm32 galcore kernel driver.
--
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
