From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently
listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh.

Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is
correct?

Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezil...@kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
index 357b8578a62f..baccf407222c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static const struct panel_desc evervision_vgg804821 = {
 };
 
 static const struct drm_display_mode foxlink_fl500wvr00_a0t_mode = {
-       .clock = 32260,
+       .clock = 35414,
        .hdisplay = 800,
        .hsync_start = 800 + 168,
        .hsync_end = 800 + 168 + 64,
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to