On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
> buffer limit.  Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
> index bf876faea592..faefaaef7909 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static struct dma_pool *ttm_dma_pool_init(struct device 
> *dev, gfp_t flags,
>       p = pool->name;
>       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t); i++) {
>               if (type & t[i]) {
> -                     p += snprintf(p, sizeof(pool->name) - (p - pool->name),
> +                     p += scnprintf(p, sizeof(pool->name) - (p - pool->name),
>                                     "%s", n[i]);
>               }
>       }
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to