On 11/06/2020 16:34, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:58 AM Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-06-08 10:48:35)
>>> The ti_sn_bridge_gpio_set() got the return value of
>>> regmap_update_bits() but didn't check it. The function can't return
>>> an error value, but we should at least print a warning if it didn't
>>> work.
>>>
>>> This fixes a compiler warning about setting "ret" but not using it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 27ed2b3f22ed ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Export bridge GPIOs to
>>> Linux")
>>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>>> index 1080e4f9df96..526add27dc03 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>>> @@ -999,6 +999,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip
>>> *chip, unsigned int offset,
>>> ret = regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_GPIO_IO_REG,
>>> BIT(SN_GPIO_OUTPUT_SHIFT + offset),
>>> val << (SN_GPIO_OUTPUT_SHIFT + offset));
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + dev_warn(pdata->dev,
>>> + "Failed to set bridge GPIO %d: %d\n", offset, ret);
>>
>> GPIO %u because it's unsigned?
>
> Sure. I'll plan to spin tomorrow in case anyone else has any
> feedback. If any maintainer would prefer me not to spin and would
> rather fix this when applying, please shout and I won't send out a v2.
>
> -Doug
>
Yes please respin, ping me on IRC if I forget to apply..
Neil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
