https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383
--- Comment #99 from mn...@protonmail.com --- (In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #98) > As much as I'd like to remove the DRM private object from the state instead > of just carrying it over I'd really rather not be hacking around behavior > from the DRM core itself. > > Maybe there's value in adding these as DRM helpers in the case where a > driver explicitly wants to remove something from the state. My guess as to > why these don't exist today is because they can be bug prone since the core > implicitly adds some objects (like CRTCs when you add a plane and CRTCs when > you add connectors) but I don't see any technical limitation for not > exposing this. I'm a little bit confused, is there anything particularly illegal or discouraged about the patch I sent? If so, how should I correct it? Should I create some sort of DRM helper for deleting a private object and use that to delete the state's associated private object? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
