On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:45:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 00:52, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:15 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Ben, did you have a chance to look at this?
> >
> > Ping
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:22 PM Maarten Lankhorst
> > > <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Op 02-08-2020 om 20:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > > > > Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the
> > > > > legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move function
> > > > > shoudn't exist anymore with atomic: With atomic the bo pinning and
> > > > > actual modeset commit is completely separated in the code patsh.
> > > > >
> > > > > This annotation was originally added in
> > > > >
> > > > > commit 060810d7abaabcab282e062c595871d661561400
> > > > > Author: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
> > > > > Date: Mon Jul 8 14:15:51 2013 +1000
> > > > >
> > > > > drm/nouveau: fix locking issues in page flipping paths
> > > > >
> > > > > due to
> > > > >
> > > > > commit b580c9e2b7ba5030a795aa2fb73b796523d65a78
> > > > > Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankho...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Date: Thu Jun 27 13:48:18 2013 +0200
> > > > >
> > > > > drm/nouveau: make flipping lockdep safe
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankho...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: nouv...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > ---
> > > > > I might be totally wrong, so this definitely needs testing :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers, Daniel
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > index 7806278dce57..a7b2a9bb0ffe 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object
> > > > > *bo, int evict, bool intr,
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > - mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > > > > + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(drm->dev))
> > > > > + mutex_lock(&cli->mutex);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > > > > +
> > > > > ret = nouveau_fence_sync(nouveau_bo(bo), chan, true, intr);
> > > > > if (ret == 0) {
> > > > > ret = drm->ttm.move(chan, bo, &bo->mem, new_reg);
> > > >
> > > > Well if you're certain it works now. :)
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
Can you pull this in through your tree and maybe give it a spin just to
make sure? I don't really have nouveau hardware here.
Also it's entirely stand-alone, I was simply reviewing all the
mutex_lock_nested we have in drm, and this one stuck out as probably not
necessary anymore, at least with atomic.
I guess I can also just stuff it into drm-misc-next and if it blows up,
figure out what to do then :-)
-Daniel
>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nouveau mailing list
> > nouv...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
