On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobs...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:20:21PM +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote: >>> > The Intel PRM says the M1 and M2 divisors must be in the range of 10-20 >>> > and 5-9. >>> > Since we do all calculations based on them being register values (which >>> > are >>> > subtracted by 2) we need to specify them accordingly. >>> >>> One thing I've just noticed is that intel_limits_i9xx_sdvo is reused by >>> g4x, so I'll double check that in the morning unless someone beats me to >>> it. >> >> Okay, so gen4 share the same values for sdvo as gen3, so we are okay in >> fixing those up. However, the same offset-by-2 exists for the g4x values >> of m1,m2. And one begins to suspect all the m values. >> -Chris > > Seems to be all M values. As we discussed on IRC this is confusing and it > might > be worth treating all values as according to specification and fix them up at > register read/write time. Makes it easier to read, but then again, the specs > play a trick on us by assuming that m1 and m2 are what we read from the regs > when calculating M. > > -Patrik
Spotted one more thing. Dot clock min and max are based on all display modes combined. E.g. i9xx_sdvo is set to 20-400 MHz but should be 100-270 MHz and i9xx_lvds is set to 20-400 MHz but should be 20-112 MHz (single channel) and 80-224 MHz (dual channel). -Patrik _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
