On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:38:53AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index 560aaecba31b..fe10fc2e7f86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -1435,11 +1435,15 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>       int i, ret;
>  
>       for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
> +             u64 vblank_count;
> +
>               if (!new_plane_state->fence)
>                       continue;
>  
>               WARN_ON(!new_plane_state->fb);
>  
> +             vblank_count = drm_crtc_vblank_count(new_plane_state->crtc);
> +
>               /*
>                * If waiting for fences pre-swap (ie: nonblock), userspace can
>                * still interrupt the operation. Instead of blocking until the
> @@ -1449,6 +1453,13 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>  
> +             /*
> +              * Check if we've missed a vblank while waiting, and if we have
> +              * signal the fence that it's signaler should be boosted
> +              */
> +             if (vblank_count != 
> drm_crtc_vblank_count(new_plane_state->crtc))
> +                     dma_fence_boost(new_plane_state->fence);

I think we should do a lot better here:
- maybe only bother doing this for single-crtc updates, and only if
  modeset isn't set. No one else cares about latency.

- We should boost _right_ when we've missed the frame, so I think we
  should have a _timeout wait here that guesstimates when the vblank is
  over (might need to throw in a vblank wait if we missed) and then boost
  immediately. Not wait a bunch of frames (worst case) until we finally
  decide to boost.

Otherwise I really like this, I think it's about the only real reason i915
isn't using atomic helpers.

Also adding Matt B for this topic.
-Daniel

> +
>               dma_fence_put(new_plane_state->fence);
>               new_plane_state->fence = NULL;
>       }
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to