On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:31 PM Christian König
<christian.koe...@amd.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, having the timestamp is a good idea as well.
>
>   drm-driver: i915
>
> I think we should rather add something like printing 
> file_operations->owner->name to the common fdinfo code.
>
> This way we would have something common for all drivers in the system. I'm 
> just not sure if that also works if they are compiled into the kernel.

Yeah common code could print driver name, busid and all that stuff. I
think the common code should also provide some helpers for the key:
value pair formatting (and maybe check for all lower-case and stuff
like that) because if we don't then this is going to be a complete
mess that's not parseable.

And value should be real semantic stuff, not "here's a string". So
accumulated time as a struct ktime as the example.
-Daniel

> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> Am 20.05.21 um 18:26 schrieb Nieto, David M:
>
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>
>
> i would like to add a unit marker for the stats that we monitor in the fd, as 
> we discussed currently we are displaying the usage percentage, because we 
> wanted to to provide single query percentages, but this may evolve with time.
>
> May I suggest to add two new fields
>
> drm-stat-interval: <64 bit> ns
> drm-stat-timestamp: <64 bit> ns
>
> If interval is set, engine utilization is calculated by doing <perc render> = 
> 100*<drm_engine_render>/<drm_stat_interval>
> if interval is not set, two reads are needed : <perc render> = 
> 100*<drm_engine_render1 - drm_engine_render0> / <drm-stat-timestamp1 - 
> drm-stat-timestamp0>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 8:12 AM
> To: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org <intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tvrtko 
> Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>; Nieto, David M <david.ni...@amd.com>; 
> Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
> Subject: [RFC 7/7] drm/i915: Expose client engine utilisation via fdinfo
>
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
>
> Similar to AMD commit
> 874442541133 ("drm/amdgpu: Add show_fdinfo() interface"), using the
> infrastructure added in previous patches, we add basic client info
> and GPU engine utilisation for i915.
>
> Example of the output:
>
>   pos:    0
>   flags:  0100002
>   mnt_id: 21
>   drm-driver: i915
>   drm-pdev:   0000:00:02.0
>   drm-client-id:      7
>   drm-engine-render:  9288864723 ns
>   drm-engine-copy:    2035071108 ns
>   drm-engine-video:   0 ns
>   drm-engine-video-enhance:   0 ns
>
> DRM related fields are appropriately prefixed for easy parsing and
> separation from generic fdinfo fields.
>
> Idea is for some fields to become either fully or partially standardised
> in order to enable writting of generic top-like tools.
>
> Initial proposal for fully standardised common fields:
>
>  drm-driver: <str>
>  drm-pdev: <aaaa:bb.cc.d>
>
> Optional fully standardised:
>
>  drm-client-id: <uint>
>
> Optional partially standardised:
>
>  engine-<str>: <u64> ns
>  memory-<str>: <u64> KiB
>
> Once agreed the format would need to go to some README or kerneldoc in
> DRM core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Cc: David M Nieto <david.ni...@amd.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h |  4 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c        |  3 ++
>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> index 1e5db7753276..5e9cfba1116b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,11 @@
>
>  #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> +#include <uapi/drm/i915_drm.h>
> +
> +#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_engine_user.h"
> +
>  #include "i915_drm_client.h"
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  #include "i915_gem.h"
> @@ -168,3 +173,66 @@ void i915_drm_clients_fini(struct i915_drm_clients 
> *clients)
>
>          xa_destroy(&clients->xarray);
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +static const char * const uabi_class_names[] = {
> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER] = "render",
> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY] = "copy",
> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO] = "video",
> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE] = "video-enhance",
> +};
> +
> +static u64 busy_add(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, unsigned int class)
> +{
> +       struct i915_gem_engines_iter it;
> +       struct intel_context *ce;
> +       u64 total = 0;
> +
> +       for_each_gem_engine(ce, rcu_dereference(ctx->engines), it) {
> +               if (ce->engine->uabi_class != class)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               total += intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(ce);
> +       }
> +
> +       return total;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +show_client_class(struct seq_file *m,
> +                 struct i915_drm_client *client,
> +                 unsigned int class)
> +{
> +       const struct list_head *list = &client->ctx_list;
> +       u64 total = atomic64_read(&client->past_runtime[class]);
> +       struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> +
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctx, list, client_link)
> +               total += busy_add(ctx, class);
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +       return seq_printf(m, "drm-engine-%s:\t%llu ns\n",
> +                         uabi_class_names[class], total);
> +}
> +
> +void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
> +{
> +       struct drm_file *file = f->private_data;
> +       struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
> +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = file_priv->dev_priv;
> +       struct i915_drm_client *client = file_priv->client;
> +       struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
> +       unsigned int i;
> +
> +       seq_printf(m, "drm-driver:\ti915\n");
> +       seq_printf(m, "drm-pdev:\t%04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> +                  pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number,
> +                  PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
> +
> +       seq_printf(m, "drm-client-id:\t%u\n", client->id);
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_class_names); i++)
> +               show_client_class(m, client, i);
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h
> index b2b69d6985e4..9885002433a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ i915_drm_client_pid(const struct i915_drm_client *client)
>          return __i915_drm_client_name(client)->pid;
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f);
> +#endif
> +
>  void i915_drm_clients_fini(struct i915_drm_clients *clients);
>
>  #endif /* !__I915_DRM_CLIENT_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 33eb7b52b58b..6b63fe4b3c26 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1694,6 +1694,9 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_driver_fops = {
>          .read = drm_read,
>          .compat_ioctl = i915_ioc32_compat_ioctl,
>          .llseek = noop_llseek,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +       .show_fdinfo = i915_drm_client_fdinfo,
> +#endif
>  };
>
>  static int
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to