On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:06 AM Matthew Auld
<matthew.william.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:48, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> >
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/12044
>
> Cool, is that ready to go? i.e can we start merging the kernel + IGT side.
Yes, it's all reviewed. Though, it sounds like Maarten had a comment
so we should settle on that before landing.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 6:35 AM Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Jason Ekstrand requested a more efficient method than userptr+set-domain
> > > to determine if the userptr object was backed by a complete set of pages
> > > upon creation. To be more efficient than simply populating the userptr
> > > using get_user_pages() (as done by the call to set-domain or execbuf),
> > > we can walk the tree of vm_area_struct and check for gaps or vma not
> > > backed by struct page (VM_PFNMAP). The question is how to handle
> > > VM_MIXEDMAP which may be either struct page or pfn backed...
> > >
> > > With discrete we are going to drop support for set_domain(), so offering
> > > a way to probe the pages, without having to resort to dummy batches has
> > > been requested.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - add new query param for the PROBE flag, so userspace can easily
> > > check if the kernel supports it(Jason).
> > > - use mmap_read_{lock, unlock}.
> > > - add some kernel-doc.
> > > v3:
> > > - In the docs also mention that PROBE doesn't guarantee that the pages
> > > will remain valid by the time they are actually used(Tvrtko).
> > > - Add a small comment for the hole finding logic(Jason).
> > > - Move the param next to all the other params which just return true.
> > >
> > > Testcase: igt/gem_userptr_blits/probe
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
> > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c | 1 +
> > > include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 20 ++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > > index 56edfeff8c02..468a7a617fbf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > > @@ -422,6 +422,34 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops
> > > i915_gem_userptr_ops = {
> > >
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +static int
> > > +probe_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
> > > +{
> > > + const unsigned long end = addr + len;
> > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > > + int ret = -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > > + for (vma = find_vma(mm, addr); vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > > + /* Check for holes, note that we also update the addr
> > > below */
> > > + if (vma->vm_start > addr)
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + if (vma->vm_end >= end) {
> > > + ret = 0;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + addr = vma->vm_end;
> > > + }
> > > + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Creates a new mm object that wraps some normal memory from the process
> > > * context - user memory.
> > > @@ -477,7 +505,8 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (args->flags & ~(I915_USERPTR_READ_ONLY |
> > > - I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED))
> > > + I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED |
> > > + I915_USERPTR_PROBE))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > if (i915_gem_object_size_2big(args->user_size))
> > > @@ -504,6 +533,16 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (args->flags & I915_USERPTR_PROBE) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Check that the range pointed to represents real struct
> > > + * pages and not iomappings (at this moment in time!)
> > > + */
> > > + ret = probe_range(current->mm, args->user_ptr,
> > > args->user_size);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
> > > obj = i915_gem_object_alloc();
> > > if (obj == NULL)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
> > > index 24e18219eb50..bbb7cac43eb4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
> > > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > > *data,
> > > case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_FENCE_ARRAY:
> > > case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_SUBMIT_FENCE:
> > > case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_TIMELINE_FENCES:
> > > + case I915_PARAM_HAS_USERPTR_PROBE:
> > > /* For the time being all of these are always true;
> > > * if some supported hardware does not have one of these
> > > * features this value needs to be provided from
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > index 975087553ea0..0d290535a6e5 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > @@ -674,6 +674,9 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
> > > */
> > > #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_TIMELINE_FENCES 55
> > >
> > > +/* Query if the kernel supports the I915_USERPTR_PROBE flag. */
> > > +#define I915_PARAM_HAS_USERPTR_PROBE 56
> > > +
> > > /* Must be kept compact -- no holes and well documented */
> > >
> > > typedef struct drm_i915_getparam {
> > > @@ -2222,12 +2225,29 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_userptr {
> > > * through the GTT. If the HW can't support readonly access, an
> > > error is
> > > * returned.
> > > *
> > > + * I915_USERPTR_PROBE:
> > > + *
> > > + * Probe the provided @user_ptr range and validate that the
> > > @user_ptr is
> > > + * indeed pointing to normal memory and that the range is also
> > > valid.
> > > + * For example if some garbage address is given to the kernel,
> > > then this
> > > + * should complain.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns -EFAULT if the probe failed.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note that this doesn't populate the backing pages, and also
> > > doesn't
> > > + * guarantee that the object will remain valid when the object is
> > > + * eventually used.
> > > + *
> > > + * The kernel supports this feature if
> > > I915_PARAM_HAS_USERPTR_PROBE
> > > + * returns a non-zero value.
> > > + *
> > > * I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED:
> > > *
> > > * NOT USED. Setting this flag will result in an error.
> > > */
> > > __u32 flags;
> > > #define I915_USERPTR_READ_ONLY 0x1
> > > +#define I915_USERPTR_PROBE 0x2
> > > #define I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED 0x80000000
> > > /**
> > > * @handle: Returned handle for the object.
> > > --
> > > 2.26.3
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
