On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 04:44:30AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 18.08.2021 04:15, Rob Herring пишет:
> >> +  tegra-clocks:
> >> +    description: child nodes are the output clocks from the CAR
> >> +    type: object
> >> +
> >> +    patternProperties:
> >> +      "^[a-z]+[0-9]+$":
> >> +        type: object
> >> +        properties:
> >> +          compatible:
> >> +            allOf:
> >> +              - items:
> >> +                  - enum:
> >> +                      - nvidia,tegra20-sclk
> >> +                      - nvidia,tegra30-sclk
> >> +                      - nvidia,tegra30-pllc
> >> +                      - nvidia,tegra30-plle
> >> +                      - nvidia,tegra30-pllm
> >> +              - const: nvidia,tegra-clock
> > You are saying the first string must be both one of the enums and 
> > 'nvidia,tegra-clock'. You don't get an error because your pattern 
> > doesn't match 'sclk'.
> > 
> 
> Could you please rephrase or clarify? If pattern doesn't match 'sclk',
> then it must match any other enum. I'm not sure what you're meaning.

"sclk" doesn't match "^[a-z]+[0-9]+$" because it's missing at least one
digit at the end. Perhaps that last + was supposed to be *?

> 
> The 'nvidia,tegra-clock' actually could be removed since it's
> superfluous now. I'll consider the removal in v9.

It also looks like your schema was meant to be something like:

        compatible:
          - items:
              - enum:
                  - nvidia,tegra20-sclk
                  - nvidia,tegra30-sclk
                  - nvidia,tegra30-pllc
                  - nvidia,tegra30-plle
                  - nvidia,tegra30-pllm
              - const: nvidia,tegra-clock

Note how the const: element is indented one more level. Now this means:
one of the enumeration values, followed by the constant value. That
matches what the example has.

That said, I agree that nvidia,tegra-clock seems a bit useless. There's
really no such thing as a generic clock, they're all different in some
way.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to