Hi, On 8/26/21 1:43 PM, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 10:23 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:03:43PM +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: >>> On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 18:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 8/24/21 10:45 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hello drm-misc and drm-intel maintainers, >>>>>> >>>>>> My "Add support for out-of-band hotplug notification" >>>>>> patchset: >>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93763/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Is ready for merging now, as discussed on IRC I based this >>>>>> series >>>>>> on top drm-tip and when trying to apply the i915 parts on top >>>>>> of drm-misc this fails due to conflict. >>>>>> >>>>>> So as Jani suggested here is a pull-req for a topic-branch >>>>>> with >>>>>> the >>>>>> entire set, minus the troublesome i915 bits. Once this has >>>>>> been >>>>>> merged >>>>>> into both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next I can push the 2 >>>>>> i915 >>>>>> patch do drm-intel-next on top of the merge. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note there are also 2 drivers/usb/typec patches in here these >>>>>> have Greg KH's Reviewed-by for merging through the drm tree, >>>>>> Since this USB code does not change all that much. I also >>>>>> checked >>>>>> and the drm-misc-next-2021-08-12 base of this tree contains >>>>>> the >>>>>> same last commit to the modified file as usb-next. >>>>>> >>>>>> Daniel Vetter mentioned on IRC that it might be better for >>>>>> you to >>>>>> simply >>>>>> pick-up the series directly from patchwork, that is fine too >>>>>> in >>>>>> that >>>>>> case don't forget to add: >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> To the entire series (given in a reply to the cover-letter) >>>>>> >>>>>> And: >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> To the usb/typec patches (patch 7/8), this was given in reply >>>>>> to a previous posting of the series and I forgot to add this >>>>>> in the resend. >>>>> >>>>> Since this is mostly touching drm core, I think it should be >>>>> merged >>>>> to >>>>> drm-misc-next first, and drm-intel-next after. Please let us >>>>> know. >>>> >>>> I agree this should go to drm-misc-next first. >>>> >>>> (I was planning on pushing this to drm-misc-next myself, >>>> but then ended up going with the topic branch because of the >>>> conflict in the i915 bits.) >>> >>> Just to be clear and avoid confusion: This pull request does apply >>> cleanly on drm-misc-next nd drm-intel-next right now. >>> >>> I'm just waiting for drm-misc-next maintainers to pull this to drm- >>> misc-next so I can pull it to drm-intel-next. >>> >>> Maxime, is that your round now? >>> or Thomas? >> >> That's me, I just pushed it to drm-misc-next > > Thank you! > I also pushed to drm-intel-next.
Thanks, I pushed the remaining 2 i915 patches depending on this to drm-intel-next last week (but I forgot to reply to this email then). Regards, Hans
