In general that change looks good. But what configuration is that?
Background is that it doesn't make much sense to compile the amdgpu driver on systems where resource_size_t is only 32bit.
Christian. Am 27.09.21 um 14:19 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> clang-14 points out that comparing an 'unsigned int' against a large 64-bit constantn is pointless: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:1206:18: error: result of comparison of constant 4294967296 with expression of type 'resource_size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare] res->start > 0x100000000ull) Rephrase the comparison using the upper_32_bits() macro, which should keep it legible while avoiding the warning. Fixes: 31b8adab3247 ("drm/amdgpu: require a root bus window above 4GB for BAR resize") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index ab3794c42d36..741a55031ca1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_resize_fb_bar(struct amdgpu_device *adev)pci_bus_for_each_resource(root, res, i) {if (res && res->flags & (IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_MEM_64) && - res->start > 0x100000000ull) + upper_32_bits(res->start) != 0) break; }
