On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:13 +0000
Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> We know that the buffer's alignment will always be a power of two;
> therefore, we can use the faster round_down() macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
*groan*.  I don't want to know where the naming of these two came from but that
is spectacular... 

Anyhow, happy to pick up 1-3 now if you like as all are good cleanup of
existing code.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c 
> b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> index 1ac94c4e9792..f8ce26a24c57 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int iio_dmaengine_buffer_submit_block(struct 
> iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>       dma_cookie_t cookie;
>  
>       block->bytes_used = min(block->size, dmaengine_buffer->max_size);
> -     block->bytes_used = rounddown(block->bytes_used,
> +     block->bytes_used = round_down(block->bytes_used,
>                       dmaengine_buffer->align);
>  
>       desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dmaengine_buffer->chan,

Reply via email to