On 2021-12-21 2:02 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Am 20.12.21 um 20:22 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
On 2021-12-20 2:17 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Am 17.12.21 um 23:27 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
Restrict jobs resubmission to suspend case
only since schedulers not initialised yet on
probe.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
index 5527c68c51de..8ebd954e06c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
continue;
- if (!ring->no_scheduler) {
+ if (adev->in_suspend && !ring->no_scheduler) {
Uff, why is that suddenly necessary? Because of the changed order?
Christian.
Yes.
Mhm, that's quite bad design then.
If you look at the original patch for this
https://www.spinics.net/lists/amd-gfx/msg67560.html you will
see that that restarting scheduler here is only relevant for
suspend/resume case because there was
a race to fix. There is no point in this code on driver init because
nothing was submitted to scheduler yet
and so it seems to me ok to add condition that this code run only
in_suspend case.
How about we keep the order as is and allow specifying the reset work
queue with drm_sched_start() ?
As i mentioned above, the fact we even have drm_sched_start there is
just part of a solution to resolve a race
during suspend/resume. It is not for device initialization and indeed,
other client drivers of gpu shcheduler never call
drm_sched_start on device init. We must guarantee that reset work queue
already initialized before any job submission to scheduler
and because of that IMHO the right place for this is drm_sched_init.
Andrey
Christian.
Andrey
drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(&ring->sched);
drm_sched_start(&ring->sched, true);
}
