Hi,

On 12/20/21 23:28, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Allow a privacy screen provider to stash its private data pointer in the
> drm_privacy_screen, and update the drm_privacy_screen_register() call to
> accept that. Also introduce a *_get_drvdata() so that it can retrieved
> back when needed.
> 
> This also touches the IBM Thinkpad platform driver, the only user of
> privacy screen today, to pass NULL for now to the updated API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <raja...@google.com>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
> v3: Initial version. Came up due to review comments on v2 of other patches.
> v2: No v2
> v1: No v1
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen.c    |  5 ++++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c    |  2 +-
>  include/drm/drm_privacy_screen_driver.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen.c
> index beaf99e9120a..03b149cc455b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,8 @@ static void drm_privacy_screen_device_release(struct 
> device *dev)
>   * * An ERR_PTR(errno) on failure.
>   */
>  struct drm_privacy_screen *drm_privacy_screen_register(
> -     struct device *parent, const struct drm_privacy_screen_ops *ops)
> +     struct device *parent, const struct drm_privacy_screen_ops *ops,
> +     void *data)
>  {
>       struct drm_privacy_screen *priv;
>       int ret;
> @@ -404,6 +405,7 @@ struct drm_privacy_screen *drm_privacy_screen_register(
>       priv->dev.parent = parent;
>       priv->dev.release = drm_privacy_screen_device_release;
>       dev_set_name(&priv->dev, "privacy_screen-%s", dev_name(parent));
> +     priv->drvdata = data;
>       priv->ops = ops;
>  
>       priv->ops->get_hw_state(priv);
> @@ -439,6 +441,7 @@ void drm_privacy_screen_unregister(struct 
> drm_privacy_screen *priv)
>       mutex_unlock(&drm_privacy_screen_devs_lock);
>  
>       mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> +     priv->drvdata = NULL;
>       priv->ops = NULL;
>       mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 341655d711ce..ccbfda2b0095 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -9782,7 +9782,7 @@ static int tpacpi_lcdshadow_init(struct ibm_init_struct 
> *iibm)
>               return 0;
>  
>       lcdshadow_dev = drm_privacy_screen_register(&tpacpi_pdev->dev,
> -                                                 &lcdshadow_ops);
> +                                                 &lcdshadow_ops, NULL);
>       if (IS_ERR(lcdshadow_dev))
>               return PTR_ERR(lcdshadow_dev);
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_privacy_screen_driver.h 
> b/include/drm/drm_privacy_screen_driver.h
> index 24591b607675..4ef246d5706f 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_privacy_screen_driver.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_privacy_screen_driver.h
> @@ -73,10 +73,21 @@ struct drm_privacy_screen {
>        * for more info.
>        */
>       enum drm_privacy_screen_status hw_state;
> +     /**
> +      * @drvdata: Private data owned by the privacy screen provider
> +      */
> +     void *drvdata;
>  };
>  
> +static inline
> +void *drm_privacy_screen_get_drvdata(struct drm_privacy_screen *priv)
> +{
> +     return priv->drvdata;
> +}
> +
>  struct drm_privacy_screen *drm_privacy_screen_register(
> -     struct device *parent, const struct drm_privacy_screen_ops *ops);
> +     struct device *parent, const struct drm_privacy_screen_ops *ops,
> +     void *data);
>  void drm_privacy_screen_unregister(struct drm_privacy_screen *priv);
>  
>  void drm_privacy_screen_call_notifier_chain(struct drm_privacy_screen *priv);
> 

Reply via email to