On 1/26/22 00:25, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:55 PM Javier Martinez Canillas > <javi...@redhat.com> wrote:
[snip] >> Should this new sysfs entry be documented in Documentation/ABI/ ? > > I'm not sure what the policy is here. I actually don't know that I'm > too worried about this being an ABI. For the purposes of our tests > then if something about this file changed (path changed or something > like that) it wouldn't be a huge deal. Presumably the test itself > would just "fail" in this case and that would clue us in that the ABI > changed and we could adapt to whatever new way was needed to discover > this. > > That being said, if the policy is that everything in sysfs is supposed > to be ABI then I can add documentation for this... > I also don't know the policy, hence the question. But in any case, I think that it could even be done as a follow-up if is needed. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
