Em Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:40:55 +0100
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org> escreveu:
> Hi Matthias/Yong,
>
> Are you ok if this patch gets merged via the media tree together with the
> remaining series, or do you prefer to apply it via SoC tree instead?
Same questions for other patches touching files outside drivers/media
on this pull request:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/7af52d61-47c7-581d-62ed-76a7f8315...@xs4all.nl/
Like those:
0004-0013-iommu-mediatek-v1-Free-the-existed-fwspec-if-the-mas.patch
0005-0013-iommu-mediatek-Return-ENODEV-if-the-device-is-NULL.patch
0006-0013-iommu-mediatek-Add-probe_defer-for-smi-larb.patch
0007-0013-iommu-mediatek-Add-device_link-between-the-consumer-.patch
Regards,
Mauro
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
>
>
> Em Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:04:59 +0800
> Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com> escreveu:
>
> > When the iommu master device enters of_iommu_xlate, the ops may be
> > NULL(iommu dev is defered), then it will initialize the fwspec here:
> >
> > [<c0c9c5bc>] (dev_iommu_fwspec_set) from [<c06bda80>]
> > (iommu_fwspec_init+0xbc/0xd4)
> > [<c06bd9c4>] (iommu_fwspec_init) from [<c06c0db4>]
> > (of_iommu_xlate+0x7c/0x12c)
> > [<c06c0d38>] (of_iommu_xlate) from [<c06c10e8>]
> > (of_iommu_configure+0x144/0x1e8)
> >
> > BUT the mtk_iommu_v1.c only supports arm32, the probing flow still is a bit
> > weird. We always expect create the fwspec internally. otherwise it will
> > enter here and return fail.
> >
> > static int mtk_iommu_create_mapping(struct device *dev,
> > struct of_phandle_args *args)
> > {
> > ...
> > if (!fwspec) {
> > ....
> > } else if (dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) {
> > >>>>>>>>>>Enter here. return fail.<<<<<<<<<<<<
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Thus, Free the existed fwspec if the master device already has fwspec.
> >
> > This issue is reported at:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/trinity-7d9ebdc9-4849-4d93-bfb5-429dcb4ee449-1626253158870@3c-app-gmx-bs01/
> >
> > Reported-by: Frank Wunderlich <fran...@public-files.de>
> > Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <fran...@public-files.de> # BPI-R2/MT7623
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
> > Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delre...@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > index be22fcf988ce..1467ba1e4417 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > @@ -425,6 +425,15 @@ static struct iommu_device
> > *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> > struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> > int err, idx = 0;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * In the deferred case, free the existed fwspec.
> > + * Always initialize the fwspec internally.
> > + */
> > + if (fwspec) {
> > + iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> > + fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "iommus",
> > "#iommu-cells",
> > idx, &iommu_spec)) {
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
Thanks,
Mauro
