On 3/3/22 21:58, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Implement struct drm_driver.dumb_create_fbdev for GEM SHMEM. The
> created buffer object returned by this function implements deferred
> I/O for its mmap operation.
>
> Add this feature to a number of drivers that use GEM SHMEM helpers
> as shadow planes over their regular video memory. The new macro
> DRM_GEM_SHMEM_DRIVER_OPS_WITH_SHADOW_PLANES sets the regular GEM
> functions and dumb_create_fbdev in struct drm_driver. Fbdev emulation
> on these drivers will now mmap the GEM SHMEM pages directly with
> deferred I/O without an intermediate shadow buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>
> ---
[snip]
> @@ -49,8 +50,20 @@ static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs
> drm_gem_shmem_funcs = {
> .vm_ops = &drm_gem_shmem_vm_ops,
> };
>
> +static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs drm_gem_shmem_funcs_fbdev = {
> + .free = drm_gem_shmem_object_free,
> + .print_info = drm_gem_shmem_object_print_info,
> + .pin = drm_gem_shmem_object_pin,
> + .unpin = drm_gem_shmem_object_unpin,
> + .get_sg_table = drm_gem_shmem_object_get_sg_table,
> + .vmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_vmap,
> + .vunmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_vunmap,
> + .mmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_mmap_fbdev,
> + .vm_ops = &drm_gem_shmem_vm_ops_fbdev,
The drm_gem_shmem_funcs_fbdev is the same than drm_gem_shmem_funcs but
.mmap and .vm_ops callbacks. Maybe adding a macro to declare these two
struct drm_gem_object_funcs could make easier to maintain it long term ?
> +};
> +
> static struct drm_gem_shmem_object *
> -__drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, bool private)
> +__drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, bool private,
> bool fbdev)
> {
> struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> @@ -70,8 +83,12 @@ __drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t
> size, bool private)
> obj = &shmem->base;
> }
>
> - if (!obj->funcs)
> - obj->funcs = &drm_gem_shmem_funcs;
> + if (!obj->funcs) {
> + if (fbdev)
Same question than in patch #6, maybe
if (defined(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION) && fbdev) ?
[snip]
> + */
> +int drm_gem_shmem_dumb_create_fbdev(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device
> *dev,
> + struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION)
> + return __drm_gem_shmem_dumb_create(file, dev, true, args);
> +#else
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +#endif
> +}
I believe the correct errno code here should be -ENOTSUPP.
[snip]
> + /* We don't use vmf->pgoff since that has the fake offset */
> + page_offset = (vmf->address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
I see this (vmf->address - vma->vm_start) calculation in many places of
this series. Maybe we could add a macro to calculate the offset instead ?
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com>
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
