In practice, trace_dma_fence_init is good enough and almost no driver
calls trace_dma_fence_emit.  But this is still more correct in theory.

Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olva...@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
index faf0c242874e..a82193f41ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/string_helpers.h>
 #include <linux/devcoredump.h>
 #include <linux/sched/task.h>
+#include <trace/events/dma_fence.h>
 
 /*
  * Power Management:
@@ -769,6 +770,7 @@ void msm_gpu_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct 
msm_gem_submit *submit)
        gpu->active_submits++;
        mutex_unlock(&gpu->active_lock);
 
+       trace_dma_fence_emit(submit->hw_fence);
        gpu->funcs->submit(gpu, submit);
        gpu->cur_ctx_seqno = submit->queue->ctx->seqno;
 
-- 
2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog

Reply via email to