On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:13:46AM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com>
>
> In i915_fence_get_driver_name(), user may not hold a
> reference to rq->engine. Hence do not access it. Instead,
> store required device private pointer in 'rq->i915' and use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathap...@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 73d5195146b0..7f6998bf390c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *slab_execute_cbs;
>
> static const char *i915_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> - return dev_name(to_request(fence)->engine->i915->drm.dev);
> + return dev_name(to_request(fence)->i915->drm.dev);
> }
>
> static const char *i915_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> @@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
> rq->engine = ce->engine;
> rq->ring = ce->ring;
> rq->execution_mask = ce->engine->mask;
> + rq->i915 = ce->engine->i915;
>
> ret = intel_timeline_get_seqno(tl, rq, &seqno);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> index 28b1f9db5487..47041ec68df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,8 @@ struct i915_request {
> struct dma_fence fence;
> spinlock_t lock;
>
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> +
> /**
> * Context and ring buffer related to this request
> * Contexts are refcounted, so when this request is associated with a
> --
> 2.20.1
>
