On 18.07.22 22:32, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:56:29 +0200 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> /* >>> * Try to move out any movable page before pinning the range. >>> */ >>> @@ -1919,7 +1948,8 @@ static long check_and_migrate_movable_pages(unsigned >>> long nr_pages, >>> folio_nr_pages(folio)); >>> } >>> >>> - if (!list_empty(&movable_page_list) || isolation_error_count) >>> + if (!list_empty(&movable_page_list) || isolation_error_count >>> + || coherent_pages) >> >> The common style is to >> >> a) add the || to the end of the previous line >> b) indent such the we have a nice-to-read alignment >> >> if (!list_empty(&movable_page_list) || isolation_error_count || >> coherent_pages) >> > > I missed that. This series is now in mm-stable so any fix will need to > be a standalone followup patch, please. > >> Apart from that lgtm. >> >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > > And your reviewed-by's will be lost. Stupid git.
I know, I already raised my concerns regarding the new workflow, so I won't repeat that. I can understand (too some degree) that we don't want code to change just before the new merge window opens. But I do wonder if we really don't even want to do subject+description updates. Sure, the commit IDs will change. Who cares? Anyhow, it is what it is. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
