Hi Thomas,

> > > - static const unsigned int default_dst_pitch[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES] = {
> > > -         0, 0, 0, 0
> > > - };
> > >           const struct drm_format_info *format = fb->format;
> > > - u8 cpp = format->cpp[0];
> > >           void (*swab_line)(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf, unsigned int 
> > > npixels);
> > > - switch (cpp) {
> > > + switch (format->cpp[0]) {
> > >           case 4:
> > >                   swab_line = drm_fb_swab32_line;
> > >                   break;
> > > @@ -230,21 +249,10 @@ void drm_fb_swab(struct iosys_map *dst, const 
> > > unsigned int *dst_pitch,
> > >           default:
> > >                   drm_warn_once(fb->dev, "Format %p4cc has unsupported 
> > > pixel size.\n",
> > >                                 &format->format);
> > > -         swab_line = NULL;
> > > -         break;
> > > - }
> > > - if (!swab_line)
> > >                   return;
> > > + }
> > > - if (!dst_pitch)
> > > -         dst_pitch = default_dst_pitch;
> > > -
> > > - if (dst->is_iomem)
> > > -         drm_fb_xfrm_toio(dst[0].vaddr_iomem, dst_pitch[0], cpp,
> > > -                          vmap[0].vaddr, fb, clip, cached, swab_line);
> > > - else
> > > -         drm_fb_xfrm(dst[0].vaddr, dst_pitch[0], cpp, vmap[0].vaddr, fb,
> > > -                     clip, cached, swab_line);
> > > + drm_fb_xfrm(dst, dst_pitch, format->cpp, vmap, fb, clip, cached, 
> > > swab_line);
> > 
> > In this case we pass fb->format-cpp as dst_pitch - so we could retreive
> > is via the fb pointer.
> 
> I don't understand this comment. We're passing format->cpp as dst_pixsize.
> I've meanwhile updated the code to compute the value from
> drm_format_info_bpp().

I wanted to ask if we could drop the format->cpp argument and in
drm_fb_xfrm() use fb->format to retrieve the char per pixel.
So we move this part down in drm_fb_xfrm(), rather than finding
the char per pixel in all callers.

Maybe some of the other callers do not allow this and then this comment
can be ignored.

I have not yet looked at the updated patch-set.

        Sam

Reply via email to