Commit d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()") introduced a regression as it may undo the clk_names setting in case the optional regulator is missing. This resulted in test and performance regressions with lima.
Restore the old behavior where clk_names is set separately so it is not undone in case of a missing optional regulator. Fixes: d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()") Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.er...@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c index 011be7ff51e1..9c8654934fea 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c @@ -113,10 +113,12 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev) int ret; const char *regulator_names[] = { "mali", NULL }; const char *clk_names[] = { "core", NULL }; - struct dev_pm_opp_config config = { - .regulator_names = regulator_names, + struct dev_pm_opp_config config_clk_names = { .clk_names = clk_names, }; + struct dev_pm_opp_config config_regulator_names = { + .regulator_names = regulator_names, + }; if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) /* Optional, continue without devfreq */ @@ -124,7 +126,15 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev) spin_lock_init(&ldevfreq->lock); - ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config(dev, &config); + /* + * Set clk_names separately so it is not undone in case of + * a missing optional regulator. + */ + ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config(dev, &config_clk_names); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config(dev, &config_regulator_names); if (ret) { /* Continue if the optional regulator is missing */ if (ret != -ENODEV) -- 2.37.3