On 09/11/2022 06:10, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 18:46 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 07/11/2022 08:22, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> Add vdosys1 mmsys compatible for MT8195 platform.
>
> For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding
> to
> 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different
> mediatek-drm drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy....@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfrapr...@collabora.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 4
> +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> l
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> l
> index 0711f1834fbd..aaabe2196185 100644
> ---
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> l
> +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> l
> @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ properties:
> - const: syscon
>
> - items:
> - - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
> + - enum:
> + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
> + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
> - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
> - const: syscon
>
I think we had that several times already:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6bbe9527-ae48-30e0-fb45-519223a74...@linaro.org/
We will something like this, but please check that this does not give
any
errors/warnings:
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
index eb451bec23d3d..8e9c4f4d7c389 100644
---
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
@@ -32,13 +32,22 @@ properties:
- mediatek,mt8183-mmsys
- mediatek,mt8186-mmsys
- mediatek,mt8192-mmsys
- - mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
- mediatek,mt8365-mmsys
- const: syscon
- items:
- const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys
- const: mediatek,mt2701-mmsys
- const: syscon
+ - items:
+ - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
+ - const: syscon
+ - items:
+ - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
+ - const: syscon
+ - items:
+ - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
+ - const: syscon
+ deprecated: true
reg:
maxItems: 1
Hi Matthias,
As the vdosys0 previous reviewed patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220927152704.12018-2-jason-jh....@mediatek.com/
Should I modify the vdosys0 items format like your example?
Or should vdosys1 add items format like vdosys0's previous patch?
- items:
- const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
- const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
- const: syscon
No, vdosys1 must not have mediatek,mt8195-mmsys fallback.
Regards,
Matthias
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
************* MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice
********************
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any
attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise
exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be
conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination,
distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its
attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe
that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of
this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not
disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!
