On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:18:27PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:07:05PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:36:47PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > >From CEA-861: > > > > > > Data Byte 1, bit A0 indicates whether Active Format Data is present in > > > Data Byte 2 bits R3 through R0. A source device shall set A0=1 when > > > any of the AFD bits are set. > > > > > > ie. if we want to set active_aspect, we need to set the > > > active_info_valid bit to 1 as well. > > > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > index 95d6f4b..8d1139f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > @@ -3107,6 +3107,7 @@ drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode(struct > > > hdmi_avi_infoframe *frame, > > > return 0; > > > > Nothing to do with this patch, but I just spotted this return here. So > > we're not populating the aspect ratio stuff if VIC=0. Doesn't really > > make sense to me. Who will tell me what this is trying to achieve? > > I wondered about that to. The intent seems to not set those bits when > we're not setting a CEA mode. I guess the author thought that only CEA > modes can understand the infoframes described in CEA-861. I haven't > found any evidence of that, but made some sense to me.
Perhaps. I'm leaning towards just killing that check though. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
