On 02/12/2022 02:18, Randolph Sapp wrote:
There was a long-standing bug from a typo that created 2 ARGB1555 and
ABGR1555 pixel format entries. Weston 10 has a sanity check that alerted
me to this issue.

According to the Supported Pixel Data formats table we have the later
entries should have been for Alpha-X instead.

Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <r...@ti.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
index ad93acc9abd2..16301bdfead1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
@@ -1858,8 +1858,8 @@ static const struct {
        { DRM_FORMAT_XBGR4444, 0x21, },
        { DRM_FORMAT_RGBX4444, 0x22, },
- { DRM_FORMAT_ARGB1555, 0x25, },
-       { DRM_FORMAT_ABGR1555, 0x26, },
+       { DRM_FORMAT_XRGB1555, 0x25, },
+       { DRM_FORMAT_XBGR1555, 0x26, },
{ DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, 0x27, },
        { DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888, 0x28, },

Thanks, I'll apply to drm-misc.

 Tomi

Reply via email to