Hi Dave,

On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> Hi Dave,
> >> 
> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer)
> >> 
> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > > Hi Dave,
> >> > > 
> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and
> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream
> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable
> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ?
> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other
> >> > > than this set.
> >> > 
> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes
> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next?
> >> > 
> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next?
> >> 
> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the
> >> branch on any -rc >= 2.
> > 
> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine.
> 
> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other
> places that have already been solved in drm-next,
> 
> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point?

As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the 
result to

        git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du

 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig           |    7                             
                                                                                
                                           
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile          |   10 -                           
                                                                                
                                           
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c    |  255 +++++++++++++-------------
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h    |   13 -
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c     |  173 +++++++-----------
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h     |   63 +++++-
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c |  202 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h |   49 +++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c   |  187 ++++++++++++++++++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h   |   50 +++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c     |  165 ++++++++++--------
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h     |   29 ---
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c |  131 ++++++++++++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h |   25 ++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c |  196 +++++++++++++++++++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h |   46 +++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c   |  170 +++++++++---------
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h   |   26 ++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h    |   94 ++++++++--
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c  |   96 ++++++++++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h  |   23 ++
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h  |   69 +++++++
 b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h     |   34 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c      |  216 -----------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h      |   24 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c       |  149 ----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h       |   24 --
 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-)

Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ 
patches on top of this drm/next/du branch.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to