On 1/17/2023 6:09 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 1/17/2023 6:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Correct sm8350_dpu_cfg.dma_cfg to point to sm8350_regdma rather than
sm8250_regdma.

Fixes: 0e91bcbb0016 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add SM8350 to hw catalog")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 3d0fbc1746e2..e6618e678384 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sm8350_dpu_cfg = {
      .vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_vbif),
      .vbif = sdm845_vbif,
      .reg_dma_count = 1,

Since you are adding the .dma_cfg, lets stick to the convention of the rest of the entries and use ARRAY_SIZE.

Since reg_dma is not an array yet,

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>

-    .dma_cfg = &sm8250_regdma,
+    .dma_cfg = &sm8350_regdma,
      .perf = &sm8350_perf_data,
      .mdss_irqs = IRQ_SM8350_MASK,
  };

Reply via email to