On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:12 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chia-I Wu <olva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:33 AM Chia-I Wu <olva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Extend the address and size validations to AMDGPU_VA_OP_UNMAP and > > > AMDGPU_VA_OP_CLEAR by moving the validations to amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl. > > > > > > Internal users of amdgpu_vm_bo_map are no longer validated but they > > > should be fine. > > > > > > Userspace (radeonsi and radv) seems fine as well. > > Does this series make sense? > > I think so, I haven't had a chance to go through this too closely yet, > but amdgpu_vm_bo_map() is used by ROCm as well so we'd need to make > sure that removing the checks in patch 1 wouldn't affect that path as > well. The changes in patch 2 look good. Also, these patches are > missing your SOB. Indeed. kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu, for example, does not validate va. I need to keep the validation in amdgpu_vm_bo_map for it at least. I guess it is more ideal for kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu to validate, but I am not familiar with amdkfd..
I can keep the existing validations, and duplicate them in amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl to cover AMDGPU_VA_OP_UNMAP/AMDGPU_VA_OP_CLEAR. > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > Alex
