On 2023-06-23 15:12:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > > > On 6/23/2023 1:28 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2023-06-23 14:37:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > <snip> > >>> In fact I asked to make it 0xf00 + 0x10 or 0xf80 + 0x10 to also cover > >>> the CTL registers, but that change didn't make it through. 0x29c is an > >>> arbitrary number that I have no clue what it was based on. > >> > >> This should have been NAKed. or at least TODOed. > > > > As usual ;) - add new features first, fix the fundamentals... later? > > > > - Marijn > > I think you yourself found out that this was not an arbitary number but > we atleast wanted to cover the full encoder set. > > So fundamentals are always sound sometimes understanding is not ;)
The fundamentals are not sound until the CTL block/register can be dumped ;) - Marijn
